This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Linux Foundation Collaboration Summit: The future of The GNUC Library.

From: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
To: Thomas Schwinge <thomas at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh dot poyarekar at gmail dot com>, "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at systemhalted dot org>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:15:52 -0600
Subject: Re: Linux Foundation Collaboration Summit: The future of The GNUC Library.
References: <CADZpyiyA9hdVHNLf8Xx3brzyu2iYw2u1ThGK7O89ajozG=3fUA@mail.gmail.com> <CAAHN_R1r+qntZeYY9Bgb_eEqhbC98gNZdcCin2dsYpKfP1Wj9g@mail.gmail.com> <4F72971D.801@redhat.com> <874nt9ciho.fsf@schwinge.name>

On 03/28/2012 01:06 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:

There is one point in favor of DejaGnu: all the other GNU toolchain
components are using it, thus a bunch of infrastructure and know-how
already exists (see Siddhesh's offer).  Open question (and I'm
undecided): is that argument enough to in fact *prefer* DejaGnu over
something else?

Most of the know-how has moved on to other interests. Folks are comfortable adding tests to the existing harness, but there are very few people that actually have knowledge of the harness itself.

Jeff

References:
- Linux Foundation Collaboration Summit: The future of The GNU C Library.
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: Linux Foundation Collaboration Summit: The future of The GNU C Library.
  - From: Siddhesh Poyarekar
- Re: Linux Foundation Collaboration Summit: The future of The GNUC Library.
  - From: Jeff Law
- Re: Linux Foundation Collaboration Summit: The future of The GNU C Library.
  - From: Thomas Schwinge

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]