This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: glibc 2.13
- From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Petr Baudis <pasky at suse dot cz>
- Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab at redhat dot com>, Brett Neumeier <bneumeier at gmail dot com>,libc-alpha <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, carlos at systemhalted dot org, Roland McGrath <roland at redhat dot com>
- Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 11:43:30 -0500
- Subject: Re: glibc 2.13
- References: <AANLkTi=LKm87gPnJMmme6q532YhW21MV0J8jccnooh--@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=1J18dGQ6KY25x6yA9Rg=4ouTcBBf0Jsq=MNWN@mail.gmail.com> <m339o8ulh2.fsf@redhat.com> <4D48A057.20709@codesourcery.com> <20110204000649.GE13985@machine.or.cz> <4D4C29A9.5090505@codesourcery.com>
On 2/4/2011 11:30 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On 2/3/2011 7:06 PM, Petr Baudis wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 07:07:51PM -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>>> On 2/1/2011 4:56 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>>> Brett Neumeier <bneumeier@gmail.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> Now that glibc and glibc-ports have been tagged for 2.13, it would be
>>>>> great if tarballs could be prepared and put on ftp.gnu.org,
>>>>
>>>> Done.
>>>
>>> If nobody is opposed I would like to volunteer to be the release
>>> manager for 2.13?
>>
>> Oops, I'm really sorry! I just pushed out the first round of
>> cherry-picks and created the wiki pages, and somehow noticed this mail
>> only when looking for the thread to post a follow-up.
>
> No worries! :-)
Petr,
For the record, would you mind documenting under "Publishing" exactly
what you did after the release was tagged?
http://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release
* Created branch?
* ...?
You will see that I've added "Create bugzilla glibc_2.13 keyword",
which I've already done so we can tag bugs (bug triage is another one
of those topics well eventually get to...).
Cheers,
Carlos.
--
Carlos O'Donell
Mentor Graphics / CodeSourcery
carlos@codesourcery.com
+1 (650) 331-3385 x716