This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: asm-generic/unistd.h and glibc use of NR_ipc
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb dot de>
- To: linasvepstas at gmail dot com
- Cc: GLIBC Devel <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>,linux-kernel at vger dot kernel dot org,Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf at tilera dot com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:40:09 +0200
- Subject: Re: asm-generic/unistd.h and glibc use of NR_ipc
- References: <AANLkTi=33kimswSJ1tYsnG-PVs6Z4dVBtnqq65GN8Vxw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tuesday 28 September 2010, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out the status of glibc w.r.t the latest linux
> unistd syscall interface, specifically, the status of the NR_ipc
> syscall. Currently, I see the following:
> -- Circa June 2009, Arnd Bergman introduced asm-generic/unistd.h
> (into the linux kernel) to provide a generic interface to system
> calls. It does *not* define NR_ipc, and instead provides
> NR_msgsnd, msgrcv, msgget, msgctl etc. syscalls.
> -- Current glibc (2.12.1, as well as the current eglibc) does
> not appear to use these new calls anywhere. Instead, glibc
> has generic (non-arch-specific) implementations of msgsnd
> etc. that use the old NR_ipc interface (see, e.g.
> sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/msgsnd.c, semget.c, shmdt.c, msgrcv.c,
> shmget.c, etc.)
> Is someone working on patches to get glibc to use the new
> syscall interfaces (for IPC)? Am I missing something? Seems like
> any arch wishing to use asm-generic/unistd.h and get glibc working
> gets to break new ground, here ... right?
Chris Metcalf is using the generic unistd.h file on the tile architecture
and has a glibc port that should be easily portable to all future
architectures. There are a few of them getting ready to be merged
now (c6x, lm32, nios2, and some people have contacted me privately
for architectures I cannot name).
I expect that all of them will just use the same syscall ABI and glibc