Re: linux:sys_ipc syscall

[Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>]

On Wednesday 06 May 2009 20:13:16 KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > I would like to ask you if someone from you work on separate ipc
> > syscalls. I mean that all code call one sys_ipc syscall not separate
> > syscall like sys_semctl, sys_semget, sys_semop, sys_msgctl,
> > sys_msgget, sys_msgrcv, sys_msgsnd, sys_shmat, sys_shmctl, sys_shmdt,
> > sys_shmget.
> >
> > I look at http://repo.or.cz/w/glibc.git and I haven't seen it there.
>
> May I ask the benfit of this change?
> In general, unnecessally ABI change cause very large end-user confusion.

the ABI change is between C library and kernel.  there is no end-user 
difference.
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.