This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] glibc 2.7 compilation failure with GCC 4.2.x due to 486+-specific memmove() redeclaration and _FORTIFY_SOURCEry

On Monday 29 October 2007, Nix wrote:
> On 29 Oct 2007, Mike Frysinger verbalised:
> > ive gotten a report or two in Gentoo about it, but i havent been able to
> > reproduce it myself
> I don't see how to make it go away, personally. It should turn up on any
> platform that uses sysdeps/i386/i486/bits/string.h, as far as I can see.
> I configured this particular platform on a PIII with this shell script:
> #!/bin/sh
> export CFLAGS="-O2 -march=native -pipe"
> export ASFLAGS="$CFLAGS"
> export LDFLAGS=""
> shift
> $CONFIGURE --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu "$@"

dunno man ... i have CFLAGS="-O2 -march=i686" and targetting i686-pc-linux-gnu 
and it builds for me.  but i'm not doubting you as the people reported your 
same failure and said your patch fixed things for them ;)

> --build-id and --as-needed by default at link time, and the latter at
> least is bad for the glibc testsuite. I have patches to allow glibc to
> build with a default-on --build-id, if you want them, but they're so
> trivial I thought nobody would care...)

i'd check cvs head and if it's still broken, post the patch

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]