This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: <linux/types.h> or <asm/types.h> ?


On Saturday 29 September 2007, Metuki Sabhe wrote:
> On 9/29/07, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > On Saturday 29 September 2007, Metuki Sabhe wrote:
> > > I need to use types like __u8 in my Linux application
> > > (which should work on many architectures).
> > >
> > > Should I use <linux/types.h> or <asm/types.h> ?
> >
> > a proper application should never use types like __u8 which means they
> > should never pull in linux/types.h or asm/types.h
> >
> > there's a reason *standard* types like uint8_t exist
>
> Thank you for this. Can you please tell me which header file declare
> these uint8_t types ?

a grep of /usr/include/ or reading the POSIX standard would tell you the 
answer: stdint.h
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]