This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Enhance soft-fp for TFmode<->[DI,SI,TI,XF]mode conversions

From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 08:45:45 -0700
Subject: Re: Enhance soft-fp for TFmode<->[DI,SI,TI,XF]mode conversions
References: <461E96A4.4090407@gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704122036060.8137@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <5787cf470704122354m6a81046bu503436f6e488aafa@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704131033560.13932@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <4620E86F.1000404@gmail.com> <20070414163829.GC355@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <46221146.4090709@gmail.com> <20070415161020.GE355@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <462BB59D.6060302@gmail.com> <46384A45.7090605@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705021210430.20099@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> The FSF policy as stated at 
> <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-03/msg00558.html> is that soft-fp is not 
> to be modified locally in GCC and that changes needed for GCC should 

I couldn't possibly care less what Stallman thinks.

-- 
â Ulrich Drepper â Red Hat, Inc. â 444 Castro St â Mountain View, CA â

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

References:
- Re: Enhance soft-fp for TFmode<->[DI,SI,TI,XF]mode conversions
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: Enhance soft-fp for TFmode<->[DI,SI,TI,XF]mode conversions
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]