This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Who did #define static dynamic?
- From: Rick Spillane <necro351 at gmail dot com>
- To: bran phlake <branphlake at yahoo dot com>, libc-alpha at gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 17:08:46 -0500
- Subject: Re: Who did #define static dynamic?
- References: <20051206214928.54803.qmail@web35104.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Other than this e-mail that you are reading now, your message will
most likely be ignored, and rightly so.
On 12/6/05, bran phlake <branphlake@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Why on earth is gcc complaining about glibc dynamic
> libraries when I'm compiling something static? Ex:
>
> warning: Using 'gethostbyname' in statically linked
> applications requires at runtime the shared libraries
> from the glibc version used for linking
>
> Static means static.
>
> As in, doesn't need any shared libraries.
>
> This is indefensible.
>
> Please make your code stop sucking.
>
>
>
> __________________________________________
> Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about.
> Just $16.99/mo. or less.
> dsl.yahoo.com
>
>
--
Rick
necro351@gmail.com