This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
So point it out to the SuSE folks, because it isn't the problem of glibc or gcc if SuSE applies patches that make things incompatible.
Uninformed that you are you are misguiding people to waist their time. You have no clue. There is no "official" glibc release out there remotely compatible with kernel 2.6 and gcc 3.4. Thus there isn't anything out there SuSE could be incompatible with.
Yup, uninformed, misguided and no clue whatsoever. That is why I have glibc 2.3.x nicely working with gcc 3.4 without introducing any silly incompatibilities, and you don't.
And even if it wouldn't compile with 3.4, you can always use a older version of gcc, and still be able to not introduce any incompatibilities.
But obviously, I don't have a clue what so ever, so I will just go back to hacking.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |