This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Thu, 2004-05-27 09:05:00 -0700, Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com> wrote in message <40B611AC.3040907@kegel.com>: > The error is discussed in http://gcc.gnu.org/PR14096 ...and others, like my 15398 or 15395 which I hit during tests for a vax-linux toolchain. > which concludes that gcc is being a bit too strict about > some inline arcana. At least the bug I submitted it targeted for GCC 3.5, so it should be a matter of a month or two to get fixed. This not only shows up during cross-compilation, but also (at least on x86_64) on native compilers. > I'm posting here in case anyone wants to light a fire under the gcc > guys, who may not realize this affects glibc, or in case > anyone has a workaround that placates gcc. Since it's already a Target Milestone for 3.5.0, I think they'll fix it soon. Fortunately, I'm not yet that far in glibc to hit this bug:) Though, I can't really decide if gcc or glibc (and Linux kernel) is wrong here... MfG, JBG -- Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@lug-owl.de . +49-172-7608481 "Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! | im Irak! ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |