This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
[PATCH] Report which of the sorting methods that fail
- From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere at hungry dot com>
- To: libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2004 14:23:47 +0100
- Subject: [PATCH] Report which of the sorting methods that fail
Here is a small improvement to the sorting test. I made it after
trying to fix an error in the test code by updating the wrong test. :)
2004-01-01 Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
* sort-test.sh: Print the status for both the sorting tests, xfrm
and collate, making it possible to know which one of them that
fail if only one of them misbehaves. Indent output from
'diff -u' when sorting test fail, to make it easier to visually
group the output.
Index: localedata/sort-test.sh
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/glibc/libc/localedata/sort-test.sh,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -3 -p -u -r1.11 sort-test.sh
--- localedata/sort-test.sh 1 May 2003 07:16:00 -0000 1.11
+++ localedata/sort-test.sh 1 Jan 2004 13:17:30 -0000
@@ -17,6 +17,13 @@ for l in $lang; do
${common_objpfx}localedata/collate-test $id < $cns.in \
> ${common_objpfx}localedata/$cns.out || here=1
cmp -s $cns.in ${common_objpfx}localedata/$cns.out || here=1
+ if test $here -eq 0; then
+ echo "$l collate-test OK"
+ else
+ echo "$l collate-test FAIL"
+ diff -u $cns.in ${common_objpfx}localedata/$cns.out | sed 's/^/ /'
+ status=1
+ fi
LOCPATH=${common_objpfx}localedata GCONV_PATH=${common_objpfx}/iconvdata \
LC_ALL=$l ${run_program_prefix} \
@@ -24,10 +31,10 @@ for l in $lang; do
> ${common_objpfx}localedata/$cns.xout || here=1
cmp -s $cns.in ${common_objpfx}localedata/$cns.xout || here=1
if test $here -eq 0; then
- echo "$l OK"
+ echo "$l xfrm-test OK"
else
- echo "$l FAIL"
- diff -u $cns.in ${common_objpfx}localedata/$cns.xout
+ echo "$l xfrm-test FAIL"
+ diff -u $cns.in ${common_objpfx}localedata/$cns.xout | sed 's/^/ /'
status=1
fi
done