This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [Linux-ia64] libc umount and umount2 can't both be right
- From: Ian Wienand <ianw at gelato dot unsw dot edu dot au>
- To: "MONTGOMERY,BOB (HP-FtCollins,ex1)" <bob dot montgomery at hp dot com>
- Cc: linux-ia64 "@" linuxia64 "." org at cse dot unsw dot edu dot au, libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 09:14:25 +1000
- Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] libc umount and umount2 can't both be right
- References: <C5C45572D968D411A1B500D0B74FF4A80CB5C80C@xfc01.fc.hp.com>
>On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 04:06:41PM -0400, MONTGOMERY,BOB (HP-FtCollins,ex1) wrote:
> In libc, umount and umount2 are the same code. They both use
> syscall number 1044 without introducing a call layer.
looks like a typo in libc to me
-i
ianw@gelato.unsw.edu.au
http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au
--- libc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/ia64/syscalls.list.old 2003-05-14 09:10:04.000000000 +1000
+++ libc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/ia64/syscalls.list 2003-05-14 09:09:40.000000000 +1000
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# File name Caller Syscall name # args Strong name Weak names
-umount2 - umount 2 __umount2 umount2
+umount2 - umount2 2 __umount2 umount2
# Whee! 64-bit systems naturally implement llseek.
llseek EXTRA lseek C:3 __libc_lseek __lseek lseek __libc_lseek64 __llseek llseek __lseek64 lseek64