This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Use of NEED_DL_SYSINFO


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ian Wienand wrote:

> But everything (else) can be the same between the two!  We get passed
> the pointer via AT_SYSINFO, all the setup stuff in NPTL etc.  Having
> some other symbol seems a bit redundant.

YOu are contradicting yourself.  Evidently it is not redundant,
otherwise you'd have no problems.


> Maybe ia32 could create
> another symbol for it's non-generic parts?

You're joking, right?  Why should this be done?  The symbol was
introduced for the expressed purpose of using it for x86 with the x86
semantics.  You cannot just hijack the symbol.


Besides, the code using this symbol will be rearranged sometime soon
anyway.  So better hold of your patch until this is handled.  Changes
are that you then can piggy-bag your requirements.

- -- 
- --------------.                        ,-.            444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \    ,-----------------'   \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat         `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+pKDO2ijCOnn/RHQRAol8AJ0Y+nkr1Ir+8RLjP4cVSqPBx4n6FQCaAv8h
L6XMKDOFMZLKVyZeRTQGW04=
=lxhE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]