This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC: Add STO_COPY (Re: Copy relocation and protected symbol don't work together)

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 16:12:37 -0800
Subject: Re: RFC: Add STO_COPY (Re: Copy relocation and protected symbol don't work together)
References: <20030326122909.A10176@lucon.org> <20030326134025.A11272@lucon.org> <20030326161114.A13101@lucon.org> <20030327163753.A1143@lucon.org> <20030328112619.A16675@lucon.org>

On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 11:26:19AM -0800, H. J. Lu wrote:
> Or we can use one bit in st_other for it.

I havn't looked at this in detail yet, but I think
STT_COPY_OBJECT is better, since the STO_ space is
quite limited.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: Add STO_COPY (Re: Copy relocation and protected symbol don't work together)
  - From: H. J. Lu

References:
- PATCH: More protected symbol tests
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: PATCH: More protected symbol tests
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Copy relocation and protected symbol don't work together
  - From: H. J. Lu
- RFC: Add STT_COPY_OBJECT (Re: Copy relocation and protected symbol don't work together)
  - From: H. J. Lu
- RFC: Add STO_COPY (Re: Copy relocation and protected symbol don't work together)
  - From: H. J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]