This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: unwind question

From: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar at ximian dot com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at twiddle dot net>
Cc: "Martin v. Loewis" <martin at v dot loewis dot de>, Owen Taylor <otaylor at redhat dot com>, "libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com" <libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: 21 Nov 2002 20:03:02 +0100
Subject: Re: unwind question
References: <1037808711.31081.43.camel@tequila><001c01c290b3$c94b82b0$f512e8d9@mira> <103<20021120174201.077F5242C4E@fresnel.labs.redhat.com><1037819250.31864.13.camel@tequila><m37kf76f1o.fsf@mira.informatik.hu-berlin.de><1037872182.31864.46.camel@tequila> <20021121101849.B27277@twiddle.net>

On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 19:18, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 10:49:42AM +0100, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
> > For example imagine a Library LIBA, which is compiled with -fexcetions,
> > which calls a function bad_func() in LIBB, which has no exception
> > tables. Is it then possible to unwind bad_func()?
> 
> No.

Well, that make -fexceptions quite useless for mono. Isn't that a
problem for languages like C++?

- Dietmar

Follow-Ups:
- Re: unwind question
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: unwind question
  - From: Martin v. Loewis

References:
- unwind question
  - From: Dietmar Maurer
- Re: unwind question
  - From: Martin v. Löwis
- Re: unwind question
  - From: Owen Taylor
- Re: unwind question
  - From: Dietmar Maurer
- Re: unwind question
  - From: Martin v. Loewis
- Re: unwind question
  - From: Dietmar Maurer
- Re: unwind question
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]