This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Why duplicated versions for *xattr?

From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Cc: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 00:23:41 -0700
Subject: Re: Why duplicated versions for *xattr?
References: <20020823230847.A13413@lucon.org> <u8d6s8oitl.fsf@gromit.moeb> <20020824001442.B13893@lucon.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

H. J. Lu wrote:

The current glibc from CVS failed to build for me on i686. I am using
gcc 3.2.1 20020821 and binutils 2.13.90.0.4. I got

Certainly works here. Check the %ebx register and examine whether gcc perhaps delays it too long.

- -- - ---------------. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE9ZzSC2ijCOnn/RHQRAu/xAKDOd9WnGLSerRNu17KHWKFL8z9AiACgm3qO
ww4hhikpV50haq13IsyFqBE=
=n7ru
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- Why duplicated versions for *xattr?
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: Why duplicated versions for *xattr?
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: Why duplicated versions for *xattr?
  - From: H. J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]