This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PATCH: FAQ entries on new binutils requirements for


    glibc-2-2-branch
Ulrich,
     Okay. How about this instead?
                                   Jack
ps I deleted the lines about binutils needing ppc 
specific patches since that is no longer true.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
--- INSTALL     Thu Apr 19 13:15:00 2001
+++ INSTALL.new Fri Aug 23 22:51:46 2002
@@ -313,7 +313,7 @@
      For PPC you might need some patches even on top of the last GCC
      version.  See the FAQ.

-   * GNU `binutils' 2.10.1 or later
+   * GNU `binutils' 2.13.90.0.4 or later

      You must use GNU binutils (as and ld) if you want to build a shared
      library.  Even if you don't, we recommend you use them anyway.  No
@@ -321,11 +321,12 @@

      The quality of binutils releases has varied a bit recently.  The
      bugs are in obscure features, but glibc uses quite a few of those.
-     2.10.1 and later releases are known to work.  Versions after
+     2.13.90.0.4 and later releases are known to work.  Versions after
      2.8.1.0.23 may or may not work.  Older versions definitely don't.

-     For PPC you might need some patches even on top of the last
-     binutils version.  See the FAQ.
+     Note: The 2.13.90.0.4 release is a Linux specific version from
+     H.J. Lu which may be obtained from the following URL:
+     <ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/devel/binutils>.

    * GNU `texinfo' 3.12f


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]