This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: --enable-oldest-abi is badly broken.

On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 11:39:45AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 11:36:09AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > H. J. Lu wrote:
> > > 1. Only GLIBC_2.3 appears in libc.map. Every symbol has version
> > > GLIBC_2.3.
> > 
> > That part is correct
> 
> I don't think so. Can you run binaries linked against the glibc
> compiled without --enable-oldest-abi=2.3 under the same glibc compiled
> with --enable-oldest-abi=2.3?
> 

BTW, when I implemented it, my intention was the same glibcs compiled
with and without --enable-oldest-abi=x.x were binary compatible. The
only difference is the one with --enable-oldest-abi=x.x is not binary
compatible with the glibc older than x.x.


H.J.
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]