This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [bhavesh@avaya.com] libc/3259: semctl on PPC barfs expecting optional 4th argument


On Monday 15 April 2002 23:15, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 09:04:32PM +0200, Franz Sirl wrote:
> > On Monday 15 April 2002 19:32, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 05:57, Franz Sirl wrote:
> > > > I guess, probably semctl.c should be
> > > > rewritten to only do va_arg if the IPC code needs the 4th argument.
> > >
> > > Contributions welcome.
> >
> > Well, give me some time, I'm busy enough with gcc-3.1 in my spare time
> > :-). BTW, is there a release pending? The 2.3cvs relabeled as 2.2.5 in rh
> > skipjack puzzles me a bit...
>
> It is not vanilla 2.3cvs, if you check the diff you'll see
> that neither mmap stdio, nor new regex nor new malloc are in there.

heh, but in -32 the diff is 2MB and you didn't diff the ChangeLog, so it's 
hard to summarize what's going on there :-). With such a large diff, wouldn't 
it be more effective to leave a anonymous CVS tree structure in there, so 
everyone can reproduce the diff?

Anyway, it seems -32 works mostly fine on PPC compiled with gcc-3.1, just 
iconv seems to have problems:

Testing EUC-TW
This might take a while
Testing GB18030 *** FAILED ***
make[2]: *** 
[/home/fsirl/BUILD/glibc-2.2.5/build-ppc-linux/iconvdata/tst-tables.out] 
Error 1
/home/fsirl/BUILD/glibc-2.2.5/build-ppc-linux/malloc/mtrace 
/home/fsirl/BUILD/glibc-2.2.5/build-ppc-linux/iconvdata/tst-loading.mtrace > 
/home/fsirl/BUILD/g
libc-2.2.5/build-ppc-linux/iconvdata/mtrace-tst-loading
make[2]: Target `tests' not remade because of errors.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/fsirl/BUILD/glibc-2.2.5/iconvdata'

Franz.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]