This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [Felipe Contreras <al593181@mail.mty.itesm.mx>] bug in useldt.h
- From: Felipe Contreras <al593181 at mail dot mty dot itesm dot mx>
- To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
- Cc: libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2001 18:17:04 -0600
- Subject: Re: [Felipe Contreras <al593181@mail.mty.itesm.mx>] bug in useldt.h
- References: <u83d2n3zrl.fsf@gromit.moeb> <m38zcf817b.fsf@myware.mynet>
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 08:06:00AM -0800, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> writes:
>
> > I can't reproduce this with current CVS sources. Can anybody else
> > reproduce this or has anybody an idea what might be the problem?
>
> Never heard of anything like this. And we should not spend much
> energy on tracking the problems of people who choose to do everything
> themselves. They will have to do the detective work. There are
> simply too many unknowns.
Please don't blame people that do things themself, that is good. Tell me
what you need, I'll track the problem.
> Try working with a kernel binary which is known to work, you a working
> glibc binary, use a different machine (there might even be bugs in the
> hardware).
How can it be a bug in the hardware? a bug in the processor? Other
people have had this problem, a search in google for 'enable-kernel
segfault' will show some.