This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: using _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 with a non-gcc compiler

To: Bruno Haible <haible at ilog dot fr>
Subject: Re: using _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 with a non-gcc compiler
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
Date: 13 Nov 2001 09:20:09 -0800
Cc: libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
References: <15343.63100.268838.501398@honolulu.ilog.fr><m3u1vzc20h.fsf@myware.mynet><15345.1321.291057.835146@honolulu.ilog.fr>
Reply-to: drepper at redhat dot com (Ulrich Drepper)

[Get raw message]

Bruno Haible <haible@ilog.fr> writes:

> Since the symbols 'dirent64' and 'rlimit64' are not mentioned by
> POSIX, this patch doesn't violate POSIX namespacing.

Of course it does.  Every symbol defined in system headers which is in
the user namespace (and all these symbols are) must be defined or
reserved in the standard.  Otherwise it's a violation.

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------

Follow-Ups:
- Re: using _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 with a non-gcc compiler
  - From: Bruno Haible

References:
- using _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 with a non-gcc compiler
  - From: Bruno Haible
- Re: using _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 with a non-gcc compiler
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: using _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 with a non-gcc compiler
  - From: Bruno Haible

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]