This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: fde-glibc.c bug
- To: rth at redhat dot com
- Subject: Re: fde-glibc.c bug
- From: Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 11:49:18 -0700
- CC: jakub at redhat dot com, drepper at redhat dot com, hjl at lucon dot org, jes at sunsite dot dk, davidm at hpl dot hp dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
- References: <d3pubkfymm.fsf@lxplus015.cern.ch> <200107020854.f628sOS01676@jeswick.caldera.de> <20010702055546.I32061@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <d3ofr3uj0v.fsf@lxplus015.cern.ch> <m3g0cf81ne.fsf@otr.mynet> <20010702175906.O32061@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <m38zi77zrc.fsf@otr.mynet> <20010703052922.Q32061@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20010703094940.A25128@redhat.com>
- Reply-to: Geoff Keating <geoffk at redhat dot com>
> Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 09:49:40 -0700
> From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
> How about a for_each_dso type function that took a callback, takes
> care of the locking, passes the link_map and mapping bounds? The
> callback returns 0 to keep searching, non-zero is passed back to
> the caller.
Just out of interest, why can't dlsym() be used?
--
- Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>