This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: A libgcc patch for gcc 3.0
On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 12:10:03AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 08:26:35 -0800
> From: "H . J . Lu" <email@example.com>
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 11:01:14AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > "H . J . Lu" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > > I am not sure if gcc 3.0 will do the right thing for glibc. Here is
> > > a patch. Basiscally, we treat libgcc_s.so as a system library. gcc
> > > will use libgcc_s.so only if it is available from system or gcc is
> > > configured with
> > >
> > > --enable-shared=libgcc/--enable-shared=gcc
> > >
> > > Any comments?
> > 1. If you're "not sure if gcc 3.0 will do the right thing for glibc"
> > it would be a good idea to:
> > 1. Check if it really doesn't.
> > 2. Identify what's going wrong. And try to explain it to the rest
> > of us.
> > 3. Try to come up with a fix.
> > Jumping straight to step 3 really isn't a good idea.
> I have done 1 and 2.
> And would you care to share your knowledge with the rest of us?
Please check the gcc/glibc mailing list archives. There are many
threads on this topic. Here are a few
I don't want to spend any more time discussing why it is bad for glibc.