This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: A libgcc patch for gcc 3.0
- To: Mark Kettenis <kettenis at science dot uva dot nl>
- Subject: Re: A libgcc patch for gcc 3.0
- From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 08:26:35 -0800
- Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
- References: <20010321143821.A28519@lucon.org> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 11:01:14AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> "H . J . Lu" <email@example.com> writes:
> > I am not sure if gcc 3.0 will do the right thing for glibc. Here is
> > a patch. Basiscally, we treat libgcc_s.so as a system library. gcc
> > will use libgcc_s.so only if it is available from system or gcc is
> > configured with
> > --enable-shared=libgcc/--enable-shared=gcc
> > Any comments?
> 1. If you're "not sure if gcc 3.0 will do the right thing for glibc"
> it would be a good idea to:
> 1. Check if it really doesn't.
> 2. Identify what's going wrong. And try to explain it to the rest
> of us.
> 3. Try to come up with a fix.
> Jumping straight to step 3 really isn't a good idea.
I have done 1 and 2.