This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: ffs vs __ffs the gcc saga continues


Raymond Burns <rayburns@eskimo.com> writes:

> My gut say's gcc is still very broken and that the glibc tree is
> relatively clean, I'm watching for changes to gcc.

ffs is a gcc builtin.  If either ffsl or __ffs work and you compile
with optimization and without -fno-builtins then you should look into
gcc.

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]