This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [rfc] no more than 1020 threads total in a processes lifetime?

To: Ben Collins <bcollins at debian dot org>
Subject: Re: [rfc] no more than 1020 threads total in a processes lifetime?
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
Date: 24 Dec 2000 09:18:33 -0800
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
References: <20001224112009.Q18814@visi.net><m34rztbwp6.fsf@otr.mynet.cygnus.com> <20001224114833.T18814@visi.net>
Reply-To: drepper at cygnus dot com (Ulrich Drepper)

Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org> writes:

> Obviously I can't know everything. If this is answered, then I'll
> look. No need for belittling comments.

But you expect me to waste my time?

> So why is it there in the linuxthreads used with glibc 2.2 (and yes,
> this is using the glibc-linuxthreads-2.2.tar.gz)?

The program is broken.  It must fail.

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [rfc] no more than 1020 threads total in a processes lifetime?
  - From: Ben Collins

References:
- [rfc] no more than 1020 threads total in a processes lifetime?
  - From: Ben Collins
- Re: [rfc] no more than 1020 threads total in a processes lifetime?
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: [rfc] no more than 1020 threads total in a processes lifetime?
  - From: Ben Collins

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]