This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Support for smaller glibc

To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at valinux dot com>
Subject: Re: Support for smaller glibc
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
Date: 29 Nov 2000 09:52:16 -0800
Cc: Mark Brown <bmark at us dot ibm dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0011290931420.1213-100000@kyle.nv.london><3A252DA4.81FC0553@us.ibm.com> <20001129093228.A21043@valinux.com>
Reply-To: drepper at cygnus dot com (Ulrich Drepper)

"H . J . Lu" <hjl@valinux.com> writes:

> Having the same soname doesn't mean problems automatically. Please
> check what sonames glibc 2.0/2.1/2.2 use. My point is it is doable. 

No.  You misunderstand.  If I have a libc without certain functions
but some with a GLIBC_2.2 version attached all applications requiring
GLIBC_2.2 will run.

That's the last thing I say about this.  I have not the slightest
interest in these additional problems.

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------

References:
- Re: Support for smaller glibc
  - From: Mo McKinlay
- Re: Support for smaller glibc
  - From: Mark Brown
- Re: Support for smaller glibc
  - From: H . J . Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]