This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: getopt change breaks ld

To: libc-alpha at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
Subject: Re: getopt change breaks ld
From: SL Baur <steve at turbolinux dot co dot jp>
Date: 12 Sep 2000 16:09:31 +0900
References: <5.0.0.19.2.20000908144551.01fdbeb0@mail.lauterbach.com> <5.0.0.19.2.20000908144551.01fdbeb0@mail.lauterbach.com> <5.0.0.19.2.20000908175542.01cc1ca0@mail.lauterbach.com> <m2n1heux5p.fsf@dejima.jp.tlan> <m3its2th2c.fsf@otr.mynet.cygnus.com>

Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> writes in libc-alpha@sourceware.cygnus.com:

> SL Baur <steve@turbolinux.co.jp> writes:
>> > Can you reproduce this on a non-PPC machine?
>> 
>> I can.  I just got it in current CVS on an Alpha.

> This should not be possible.  Ld uses getopt in the long_only mode and
> the behavior hasn't changed for this mode.  Make sure you really got
> the getopt with the last patch in it and actually use this fixed
> version of the libc.

O.K.  You're right.  It appears I got a snapshot in between patches.

References:
- getopt change breaks ld
  - From: Franz Sirl
- Re: getopt change breaks ld
  - From: Franz Sirl
- Re: getopt change breaks ld
  - From: SL Baur
- Re: getopt change breaks ld
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]