This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: __STDC_ISO_10646__ missing in glibc-2.1.91

To: drepper at cygnus dot com (Ulrich Drepper)
Subject: Re: __STDC_ISO_10646__ missing in glibc-2.1.91
From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
Date: 14 Aug 2000 07:48:31 +0200
Cc: Markus Kuhn <Markus dot Kuhn at cl dot cam dot ac dot uk>,libc-alpha at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
References: <E13MRUl-0000Ok-00@wisbech.cl.cam.ac.uk><u8punemva9.fsf@gromit.rhein-neckar.de><m3sns8zbi3.fsf@otr.mynet.cygnus.com>

>>>>> Ulrich Drepper writes:

Uli> Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> writes:
>> Uli, did you ask Michael Everson?

Uli> No.  Why?

The question is which value should the constant have?  January 2000 is
the best value I'm aware off - but I'm not sure if it's the right one.

>> For now I propose to add January 2000.
>> 
>> Ok, to commit?  Or shall I contact Michael first?

Uli> I've applied the (modified) patch.  Thanks,
Thanks,
Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
   private aj@arthur.inka.de
    http://www.suse.de/~aj

Follow-Ups:
- Re: __STDC_ISO_10646__ missing in glibc-2.1.91
  - From: Markus Kuhn

References:
- __STDC_ISO_10646__ missing in glibc-2.1.91
  - From: Markus Kuhn
- Re: __STDC_ISO_10646__ missing in glibc-2.1.91
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: __STDC_ISO_10646__ missing in glibc-2.1.91
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]