This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: ISIRI-3342 converter broken




On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, Pablo Saratxaga wrote:

> That point isn't really very important (I doubt it would even be used).

I have seen not even a single usage of 0x80--0x9F in ISIRI-3342, except
the higher TAB.

> On the other hand an almost blind conversion (using the values in the charset
> description file) would be good enough in most of the cases.

I agree. 

> Another thing; there are some chars that are close in shape, and sometimes
> are interchanged; for example I've seen web pages in Farsi language written
> in utf-8 that uses the unicode char ALEF MAKSURA in place of FARSI YEH (the
> shapes are almost identical).

That's because of some bugs in Microsoft software, of course. Regardless
of this, your word is completely true.

> Anyway, it may be desirable, from a user perspective, to convert both sets
> of digits to the digits 0xb0-0xb9 in ISIRI-3342

It is. Even from a programmers perpective.

--roozbeh



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]