This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: undefined versioned symbol name getrlimit@@GLIBC_2.1.3
> Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-unsubscribe-geoffk=cygnus.com@sourceware.cygnus.com>
> List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com>
> List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/libc-alpha/>
> List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.cygnus.com>
> List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.cygnus.com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 09:55:46 +0100
> From: Thorsten Kukuk <kukuk@suse.de>
> Cc: GNU libc testers <libc-alpha@sourceware.cygnus.com>
>
>
> --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Dec 17, Kaoru Fukui wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > i got a error of getrlimit@@GLIBC_2.1.3 in recent glibc-2.1.3 of cvs.
> > I used gcc-2.96 and gcc-2.95.2.
> > it was same error.
> >
> > binutils-2.9.5.0.19
> > Mklinux-pre-R1
> >
> > Any suggestion.
>
> Yes, PPC is broken in the moment. Read also my mail on linuxppc-dev.
> There is a problem with binary compatibility and the new RLIM_INFINITY
> from the new 2.3.x kernels. No PPC developer is interested in finding
> a solution (like there is for Intel, Alpha and now SPARC/SPARC64).
My understanding is that the best thing to do is wait until the kernel
is stable before trying to patch glibc for it.
--
- Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@cygnus.com>