This is the mail archive of the
kawa@sourceware.org
mailing list for the Kawa project.
Re: extended "colon notation" [feedback needed]
Jim White wrote:
Per Bothner wrote:
Jim White wrote:
Is any of the above [syntaxes for cast] better than (as ...)?
Only if you're using a namespace definition:
Since it is so hard to find a suitable name/symbol, how about having none?
(TYPE: VALUE)
Or is there a reason this won't work? I see that the problem with
((TYPE) VALUE) is that this has to do with the colon stuff.
Oops. Nevermind. Kawa's keyword flavor. I'll omit the rhetoric about
how it is a bad thing to have unconventional keyword syntax.
Jim