Re: Extraneous define-namespace warning

[Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>]

Chris Dean wrote:

> Well if you put it that way (!), yes namespaces should be scoped just
> like other define objects.  That is, lexically scoped and it should obey
> the module-export semantics if defined at the top level of a module.

I checked in a small patch which should help.

> However, define-namespace has some nice compiler optimizations that make
> for some very fast code and I wouldn't want to lose that feature at the
> expense of any new features.

Well, try it out, and see how well it works.

> This may be off topic, but do you have any plans for changing or
> modifying the module/package management in the future?  

Not really.  I will want to implement modules for Qexo (perhaps after 
the new draft - the version in the current draft seems porrly thought 
out).  Any suggestions/requests?

I do see changing the following convention for methods using 
tail-recursion, but that isn't really related.
--
	--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com   http://per.bothner.com/