This is the mail archive of the
insight@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Insight project.
Re: Separate preferences for native and cross debugger in Insight.
- To: Fernando Nasser <fnasser at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: Separate preferences for native and cross debugger in Insight.
- From: Ton van Overbeek <tvoverbe at cistron dot nl>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 20:36:50 +0200
- Cc: insight at sources dot redhat dot com,fnasser at cygnus dot com,keiths at cygnus dot com,Tom Tromey <tromey at cygnus dot com>
- References: <3.0.6.32.20010609225025.0079ecf0@127.0.0.1>
At 12:34 6/10/2001 -0400, Fernando Nasser wrote:
>Ton van Overbeek wrote:
>>
>> On June 5 I submitted a small patch to use separate gdbtk.ini files
>> for native and cross debuggers.
>
>It is a small patch, but it represents a significant change.
>
>I would particularly like to hear some comments from Tom Tromey about
>this change. He has spent some time thinking about the way we organize
>preferences and have created our "session" facilities.
>
>BTW, I wonder if the "sessions" code should not be enough to solve your
>original problem...
>
Thanks for the pointer to the 'sessions' code. It does solve part
of my original problem. However things like window layout, which windows
open, etc. are not saved in a 'session'.
So when running (as in my case) both the native cygwin gdb and a cross
gdb/insight under cygwin there is still a mix of settings. Also a session
(= mainly exec file, search paths, etc.) for the native gdb is
garbage for the cross and vice versa.
There is no entry in the on-line help for 'sessions'. If I get to know
it a little bit better I might find to some time to propose an addition
to the srcwin help about sessions.
>No, your submission was correct. You must understand that Open Source
>projects are based on volunteer work and people have day-time jobs.
>Eventualy we get hold up by work and some backlog builds up. But do
>feel free to 'ping' us if you suspect you submission may have gone
>unoticed (yes, it may happen with so many e-mails). Maintainers usually
>apreciate that people do that.
>
My previous message was indeed intended as a 'ping'.
I do have a full-time job myself, so I certainly do appreciate all
the volunteer work you guys put in. I can imagine the problems you must
have when you are working in one specific area of gdb/insight and then a
message comes in affecting a completely different area.
>And, regardless of what people decide (make this change or not), thank
>you for taking the time to do this.
>
Thanks and keep up the good work.
Ton van Overbeek