This is the mail archive of the
insight@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Insight project.
Re: Warning: Couldn't restore frame in current thread
- To: Keith Seitz <keiths at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: Warning: Couldn't restore frame in current thread
- From: Holger Vogt <hl212vo at uni-duisburg dot de>
- Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 18:56:32 +0200
- CC: Holger Vogt <hl212vo at uni-duisburg dot de>, insight at sources dot redhat dot com
- References: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0105011828290.19787-100000@ryobi.cygnus.com>
- Reply-To: hl212vo at uni-duisburg dot de
The messages requested are:
$ gcc -v
Reading specs from /bin/../lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/2.95.3-4/specs
gcc version 2.95.3-4 (cygwin special)
$ uname -a
CYGWIN_98-4.10 A7W7R0 1.3.1(0.38/3/2) 2001-04-24 20:01 i586 unknown
My insight history is:
downloaded sources insight-5_0_tar.bz2 at 07/23/00
compiled with CYGWIN version actual at that time out of the box,
running configure, make, make install: absolutely no problems!
upgraded CYGWIN form time to time, also including gdb, by setup.exe, only
binaries. Actual gdb: gdb-20001125-1.tar. Warning message appeared around that
time ?!
Removed the old insight installation from /usr/local: still warning message.
Recompiled the July sources with CC='gcc -mwin32' configure, moved only gdb.exe to
/bin: gdb -nw is o.k., gdb exits without displaying any window.
Is the email from Fernando Nasser directly related to my problem? Where could I
find the actual sources to apply this patch?
Holger
Keith Seitz schrieb:
> On Wed, 2 May 2001, Holger Vogt wrote:
>
> > gdb -nw is working without problems.
> >
> > In Insight either typing n, s, si to the console window or mouse-clicking to
> > the source window will generate the warning message. It appears for the
> > first time after typing 'run' to the console window.
>
> Wow, that is weird. The warning message you are displaying comes from gdb.
> I would not expect Insight to show this message at all. Something fishy
> must be going on...
>
> What does gdb -v show? (If you're on cygwin, can you include the output of
> "gcc -v" and "uname -a", too?)
>
> Keith