This is the mail archive of the insight@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the Insight project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
At 04:44 PM 11/7/00 -0500, Larry Smith wrote: >One bug report we have here says that highlighting "argv[0]" >and adding it to the watchlist results in adding "argv", not >"argv[0]" and that the latter should be correct. > >However, this seems to me to be another example of a C-ish >orientation. Gdbtk has no notion of a "type", such as an >array, nor code to parse array element notation - in C, or >any other supported language. Trying to add it sounds like >a poorly-considered can of worms. Should I quash this report, >or can someone suggest a generic and non-hacky way for the >gdbtk code to magically become aware of arrays in all supported >languages? > >Or...does someone want to see "argv[0]" special-cased? I don't think that we should special case argv[0] like this. Syd Polk spolk@redhat.com Engineering Manager +1 415 777 9810 x 241 Red Hat, Inc.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |