This is the mail archive of the
guile@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Guile project.
Re: Dynamic bindings? (was Re: Subtle bug with GCC optimization?)
- To: djurfeldt at nada dot kth dot se
- Subject: Re: Dynamic bindings? (was Re: Subtle bug with GCC optimization?)
- From: Marius Vollmer <mvo at zagadka dot ping dot de>
- Date: 15 Aug 2000 03:30:13 +0200
- Cc: guile at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- References: <873dk8al8d.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <xy7em3rnzyy.fsf@mdj.nada.kth.se>
Mikael Djurfeldt <mdj@mdj.nada.kth.se> writes:
> Marius Vollmer <mvo@zagadka.ping.de> writes:
>
> > after changing something in scm_ithrow
>
> I don't know what you're working on, but if it's support for real
> dynamic bindings, you might want to look at the @bind form in eval.c
> (SCM_IM_AT_BIND) and dynwind.c:scm_swap_bindings.
Err, no, this change had to do with changing Guile's initialization
method. I'm working on the stack base thing. There will no longer be
a default catch and therefore scm_ithrow will have to supply the
default behaviour itself.