This is the mail archive of the guile@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the Guile project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Support for unexec:ing in libguile (Re: Code compiling (marshalling?))

To: djurfeldt at nada dot kth dot se
Subject: Re: Support for unexec:ing in libguile (Re: Code compiling (marshalling?))
From: Miroslav Silovic <silovic at zesoi dot fer dot hr>
Date: 14 Aug 2000 04:02:14 +0200
Cc: Marius Vollmer <mvo at zagadka dot ping dot de>, Ian Bicking <ianb at colorstudy dot com>, Guile Mailing List <guile at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
References: <20000809014401.A1354@localhost> <87vgxanmdx.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <20000810123046.A726@localhost> <87k8dnlfuc.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <xy7n1ig22o9.fsf_-_@mdj.nada.kth.se>

Mikael Djurfeldt <mdj@mdj.nada.kth.se> writes:

> What about adding easy-to-use unexec support to libguile?
> 
> Can we use your old unexec code?

If I recall correctly, the general gripe about unexec-like boots was
that unexec doesn't reinit system resources (like sockets).

Perhaps an implementation that uses GOOPS to call revive-after-unexec
generic on all the live objects?

-- 
How to eff the ineffable?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Support for unexec:ing in libguile (Re: Code compiling (marshalling?))
  - From: Mikael Djurfeldt

References:
- Code compiling (marshalling?)
  - From: Ian Bicking
- Re: Code compiling (marshalling?)
  - From: Marius Vollmer
- Re: Code compiling (marshalling?)
  - From: Ian Bicking
- Re: Code compiling (marshalling?)
  - From: Marius Vollmer
- Support for unexec:ing in libguile (Re: Code compiling (marshalling?))
  - From: Mikael Djurfeldt

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]