This is the mail archive of the
guile@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Guile project.
Re: debug evaluator is faster than regular one?
- To: Jost Boekemeier <jostobfe at calvados dot zrz dot TU-Berlin dot DE>
- Subject: Re: debug evaluator is faster than regular one?
- From: cwitty at newtonlabs dot com (Carl R. Witty)
- Date: 27 Jul 2000 10:12:35 -0700
- Cc: Ian Grant <Ian dot Grant at cl dot cam dot ac dot uk>, Brad Knotwell <knotwell at ix dot netcom dot com>, guile at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- References: <E13HS4y-0000tx-00@wisbech.cl.cam.ac.uk> <p2tk8e9rlq2.fsf@ruebe.zrz.tu-berlin.de>
Jost Boekemeier <jostobfe@calvados.zrz.TU-Berlin.DE> writes:
> > I don't know. But sometimes there are issues with calling conventions
> > (passing structs by value and what-not) and people need to use the native
> > compiler because they're linking with code that was compiled with the native
> > compiler. I think instances like this are rare, but they happen.
>
> Hmm, does that mean that on some systems a library created with gcc
> can't be linked into an executable created with the native compiler?
This certainly has been true in the past. The last example of this
that I ran into was in the gcc 1.x days; I don't know if any of gcc's
current ports have this problem.
Carl Witty