guile archive
date index for July, 2000

This is the mail archive of the guile@sourceware.org mailing list for the Guile project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

July 31, 2000
23:36 Re: continuation and multi-threading Keisuke Nishida
22:49 Re: continuation and multi-threading Craig Brozefsky
20:59 Re: continuation and multi-threading Keisuke Nishida
17:11 Re: guile-vm-0.0 Doug Evans
17:03 Re: continuation and multi-threading Mikael Djurfeldt
17:02 Re: guile-vm-0.0 Carl R. Witty
16:46 Re: C-like identity? Ian Bicking
14:52 Re: continuation and multi-threading Craig Brozefsky
14:47 Re: continuation and multi-threading Keisuke Nishida
14:37 Error handling from C Juli-Manel Merino Vidal
14:17 Re: continuation and multi-threading Keisuke Nishida
14:03 Re: continuation and multi-threading Khimenko Victor
13:58 Re: compiling syntax and macro Mikael Djurfeldt
13:50 Re: continuation and multi-threading Mikael Djurfeldt
13:47 Re: continuation and multi-threading Mikael Djurfeldt
13:37 Re: continuation and multi-threading Jed Davis
13:36 Re: compiling syntax and macro Keisuke Nishida
13:28 Re: compiling syntax and macro Klaus Schilling
13:24 Re: guile-vm-0.0 Keisuke Nishida
13:13 Re: Another CTAX syntax RFC Mikael Djurfeldt
13:11 continuation and multi-threading Keisuke Nishida
13:07 Re: GUILE's GC - why we struggling to solve already solved problems ? (was Re: finding the top of the stack in linux) Mikael Djurfeldt
13:05 Re: GUILE's GC - why we struggling to solve already solved problems ? (was Re: finding the top of the stack in linux) Khimenko Victor
13:04 Re: debug evaluator is faster than regular one? Khimenko Victor
13:03 Re: Guile-gtk 0.19 Released Khimenko Victor
12:49 Re: C-like identity? Marius Vollmer
12:49 Re: guile-vm-0.0 Marius Vollmer
12:49 Re: guile-vm-0.0 Marius Vollmer
11:19 Re: Another CTAX syntax RFC richard
11:02 Another CTAX syntax RFC Ian Bicking
10:03 Re: compiling syntax and macro Mikael Djurfeldt
07:49 Debugging Guile with GDB Jost Boekemeier
07:36 Re: guile-vm-0.0 Jost Boekemeier
07:14 Re: Module inclusion question Jost Boekemeier
07:09 Re: guile-vm-0.0 Russell McManus
07:02 Re: debug evaluator is faster than regular one? Jost Boekemeier
07:00 Re: guile-vm-0.0 Jost Boekemeier
00:30 Re: Guile-gtk 0.19 Released Vladimir Tsichevski

July 30, 2000
23:31 compiling syntax and macro Keisuke Nishida
20:13 Module inclusion question Robert Graham Merkel
19:57 Re: C-like identity? Mikael Djurfeldt
19:13 Re: C-like identity? Ian Bicking
16:25 Re: guile-vm-0.0 sen_ml
15:58 Re: guile-vm-0.0 Keisuke Nishida
15:55 Guile-gtk 0.19 Released Ariel Rios
15:42 Re: guile-vm-0.0 Keisuke Nishida
15:30 Re: guile-vm-0.0 Keisuke Nishida
15:05 Re: guile-vm-0.0 Miroslav Silovic
15:01 Re: Making shure that guile compiles with non GNU compilers Mark Galassi
14:58 Re: debug evaluator is faster than regular one? Mark Galassi
14:53 Re: guile-vm-0.0 Marius Vollmer
14:53 Re: guile-vm-0.0 Marius Vollmer
14:53 Re: C-like identity? Marius Vollmer
14:53 Re: guile-vm-0.0 Marius Vollmer
14:52 Re: guile-vm-0.0 Mikael Djurfeldt
14:33 Re: guile-vm-0.0 Ian Bicking
14:16 Re: guile-vm-0.0 Keisuke Nishida
13:56 Re: C-like identity? Ian Bicking
13:52 Re: guile-vm-0.0 Ian Bicking
13:43 Re: C-like identity? Alex Shinn
12:53 Re: guile-vm-0.0 Keisuke Nishida
12:10 Re: guile-vm-0.0 Mikael Djurfeldt
12:09 Re: guile-vm-0.0 Keisuke Nishida
11:52 Re: guile-vm-0.0 Keisuke Nishida
10:39 Re: C-like identity? ianb
10:37 Re: C-like identity? ianb
09:47 Re: goops methods on C level Mikael Djurfeldt
06:41 Re: guile-vm-0.0 Marius Vollmer
06:41 Re: guile-vm-0.0 Marius Vollmer
06:41 Re: C-like identity? Marius Vollmer
00:59 goops methods on C level Klaus Schilling

July 29, 2000
20:46 Re: guile-vm-0.0 Keisuke Nishida
12:59 Re: guile-vm-0.0 Keisuke Nishida
11:56 Re: guile-vm-0.0 Keisuke Nishida
08:39 Re: Wright's pattern matcher rm
07:03 Re: guile-vm-0.0 Marius Vollmer
06:25 Re: Making shure that guile compiles with non GNU compilers Jost Boekemeier
05:42 Re: guile-vm-0.0 Jost Boekemeier

July 28, 2000
20:42 guile-vm-0.0 Keisuke Nishida
19:28 ANNOUNCE: CGEN 1.0 is released (fwd) Ben Elliston
17:59 Wright's pattern matcher Lynn Winebarger
08:58 Re: Scheme profiler? Mikael Djurfeldt
07:53 Re: Scheme profiler? Harvey J. Stein
07:28 Re: Scheme profiler? Keisuke Nishida

July 27, 2000
18:20 Re: Scheme profiler? Mikael Djurfeldt
18:06 Re: GUILE's GC - why we struggling to solve already solved problems ? (was Re: finding the top of the stack in linux) Mikael Djurfeldt
14:42 Re: [comp.lang.scheme] Re: I'm allergic to anything Java Dale P. Smith
13:08 [comp.lang.scheme] Re: I'm allergic to anything Java thi
12:52 Re: debug evaluator is faster than regular one? Carl R. Witty
12:50 Re: debug evaluator is faster than regular one? Mikael Djurfeldt
12:43 Re: debug evaluator is faster than regular one? Keisuke Nishida
12:14 Re: debug evaluator is faster than regular one? Keisuke Nishida
10:28 Re: C-like identity? Carl R. Witty
10:12 Re: debug evaluator is faster than regular one? Carl R. Witty
10:10 Re: debug evaluator is faster than regular one? Carl R. Witty
09:06 Compiling Guile with non-gcc compilers Mikael Djurfeldt
08:34 Re: debug evaluator is faster than regular one? Doug Evans
07:53 Re: Making shure that guile compiles with non GNU compilers Clark McGrew
07:20 Making shure that guile compiles with non GNU compilers Jost Boekemeier
06:51 Re: a module spanning a .c and a .scm file Mikael Djurfeldt
04:47 Re: Returning status from C functions Gary Houston
02:46 Re: Returning status from C functions Dirk Herrmann
01:23 Re: C-like identity? Ian Grant
00:24 a module spanning a .c and a .scm file Shawn
00:16 Re: C-like identity? Tom Tromey
00:13 Re: C-like identity? Ivan Toshkov

July 26, 2000
23:07 C-like identity? Ian Bicking
19:22 Re: debug evaluator is faster than regular one? Chris Cramer
15:06 Re: debug evaluator is faster than regular one? Keisuke Nishida
14:18 Re: FAQ + new idea Mikael Djurfeldt
14:13 Re: FAQ + new idea thi
12:56 FAQ + new idea Mikael Djurfeldt
11:27 Re: debug evaluator is faster than regular one? Michael Vanier
10:41 Re: debug evaluator is faster than regular one? Keisuke Nishida
09:46 Re: debug evaluator is faster than regular one? Ian Grant
07:49 Re: debug evaluator is faster than regular one? Jost Boekemeier
07:22 Re: debug evaluator is faster than regular one? Ian Grant
07:18 Returning status from C functions Ian Grant
06:58 Re: debug evaluator is faster than regular one? Jost Boekemeier
06:41 Re: faq on the comebaq! Ian Grant
04:53 faq on the comebaq! thi
04:34 Re: guile and slib Dirk Herrmann

July 25, 2000
22:53 Re: debug evaluator is faster than regular one? Brad Knotwell
22:18 mdj will do generic translation support Mikael Djurfeldt
17:10 Re: debug evaluator is faster than regular one? Doug Evans
14:58 Re: debug evaluator is faster than regular one? Mikael Djurfeldt
14:26 Re: How should I write a program? Neil Jerram
14:17 Re: debug evaluator is faster than regular one? Keisuke Nishida
13:24 Re: debug evaluator is faster than regular one? Mikael Djurfeldt
11:51 debug evaluator is faster than regular one? Keisuke Nishida
10:17 guile and slib Patrik Sundberg
07:39 Re: Scm_sloppy_assq mostly fixed, still real slow Mikael Djurfeldt
07:16 Re: How do I ... (Goops) Mikael Djurfeldt
07:08 Re: ice-9/boot.scm name Mikael Djurfeldt
07:01 Re: ice-9/boot.scm name Bill Schottstaedt
06:52 ice-9/boot.scm name Olivier Buechel
06:30 ice-9/boot.scm name Bill Schottstaedt

July 24, 2000
19:24 Re: Again: Guile + Boehm's gc Telford Tendys
17:43 Re: bug in scm_make_struct? Mikael Djurfeldt
16:12 guile 1.4 Clark McGrew
15:42 Re: CTAX revisited Marius Vollmer
09:48 Re: Again: Guile + Boehm's gc Marius Vollmer
09:48 Re: CTAX revisited Marius Vollmer
08:37 Re: Again: Guile + Boehm's gc Clark McGrew
08:14 Re: Again: Guile + Boehm's gc Jost Boekemeier
07:15 Re: Again: Guile + Boehm's gc Clark McGrew
04:35 Re: Again: Guile + Boehm's gc Khimenko Victor
04:25 Re: Failure: explicit mark stack Michael Livshin
03:39 Failure: explicit mark stack Dirk Herrmann
01:11 Re: Capturing main - a heretical experiment. bernard URBAN

July 23, 2000
22:53 Re: How should I write a program? thi
16:07 Re: How should I write a program? Marius Vollmer
16:07 Re: (ice-9 common-list) `uniq' replacement Marius Vollmer
15:38 Re: Again: Guile + Boehm's gc Clark McGrew
14:51 Re: CTAX revisited Ian Bicking
14:48 How should I write a program? Juli-Manel Merino Vidal
14:45 Re: CTAX revisited Mikael Djurfeldt
14:37 Re: CTAX revisited Marius Vollmer
11:59 Re: CTAX revisited Mikael Djurfeldt
11:12 CTAX revisited Ian Bicking
10:05 Re: Again: Guile + Boehm's gc Khimenko Victor
07:56 Re: Again: Guile + Boehm's gc Clark McGrew
05:13 (ice-9 common-list) `uniq' replacement thi
04:50 Re: Guile bug: strftime Marius Vollmer
01:10 Bug in assq/v/oc-remove! primitives (with patch) Neil Jerram

July 22, 2000
19:00 Guile bug: strftime David Barts
14:48 Help---lost messages Mikael Djurfeldt
07:06 Re: Again: Guile + Boehm's gc Jost Boekemeier
05:08 Re: Again: Guile + Boehm's gc Marius Vollmer
04:07 Again: Guile + Boehm's gc Dirk Herrmann
03:28 Re: graphics (gtk ?) in guile Marius Vollmer
01:46 Capturing main - a heretical experiment. satchell
01:36 graphics or rather widgets in guile. satchell

July 21, 2000
15:26 Re: Will guile ever have (or care about having) users? Chris Cramer
14:02 maybe withdrawing srfi-17 Per Bothner
12:10 graphics (gtk ?) in guile Roland Orre
11:51 Re: Will guile ever have (or care about having) users? Westley A Sherman
10:09 NOISE: list etiquette thi
09:25 Re: Will guile ever have (or care about having) users? jldasch
09:12 Re: graphics in scheme? Eric Marsden
07:27 Re: Will guile ever have (or care about having) users? jldasch
06:51 Re: Will guile ever have (or care about having) users? Bill Gribble
05:19 RE: OK, what about some resolution (Re: GUILE's GC - why we struggling to solve already solved problems?) Matthew Flatt
03:45 Mail archive glitch Han-Wen Nienhuys

July 20, 2000
19:44 Re: Will guile ever have (or care about having) users? Telford Tendys
19:05 Re: graphics in scheme? Telford Tendys
15:58 Re: graphics in scheme? rm
14:12 Re: Making xfig drawings with scheme Harvey J. Stein
12:59 Re: graphics in scheme? Marius Vollmer
11:37 RE: OK, what about some resolution (Re: GUILE's GC - why we struggling to solve already solved problems?) Brent Fulgham
10:20 Re: Making xfig drawings with scheme rm
08:41 Re: Making xfig drawings with scheme Harvey J. Stein
08:38 Re: graphics in scheme? Harvey J. Stein
08:19 Re: Making xfig drawings with scheme Ian Grant
07:59 Re: Making xfig drawings with scheme Dirk Herrmann
07:55 Re: graphics in scheme? Dirk Herrmann
03:44 Re: graphics in scheme? rm
03:14 Making xfig drawings with scheme Ian Grant
02:22 Re: Will guile ever have (or care about having) users? bernard URBAN
01:44 graphics in scheme? Dirk Herrmann

July 19, 2000
22:02 Re: GC stuff Khimenko Victor
20:43 Re: OK, what about some resolution (Re: GUILE's GC - why we struggling to solve already solved problems?) Jim Blandy
18:43 GC stuff Chris Cramer
13:02 Re: Will guile ever have (or care about having) users? Jost Boekemeier
12:44 Will guile ever have (or care about having) users? John Daschbach
11:39 Re: OK, what about some resolution (Re: GUILE's GC - why we struggling to solve already solved problems?) Dale P. Smith
11:03 Re: OK, what about some resolution (Re: GUILE's GC - why we struggling to solve already solved problems?) Jost Boekemeier
08:12 Re: OK, what about some resolution (Re: GUILE's GC - why we struggling to solve already solved problems?) Han-Wen Nienhuys
08:04 Re: OK, what about some resolution (Re: GUILE's GC - why we struggling to solve already solved problems?) bernard URBAN
07:42 Re: OK, what about some resolution (Re: GUILE's GC - why we struggling to solve already solved problems?) Michael Livshin
07:34 Re: OK, what about some resolution (Re: GUILE's GC - why we struggling to solve already solved problems?) Clark McGrew
07:05 Re: OK, what about some resolution (Re: GUILE's GC - why we struggling to solve already solved problems?) Khimenko Victor
06:57 Re: OK, what about some resolution (Re: GUILE's GC - why we struggling to solve already solved problems?) Michael Livshin
06:55 Re: OK, what about some resolution (Re: GUILE's GC - why we strugglingto solve already solved problems?) Han-Wen Nienhuys
06:20 Re: OK, what about some resolution (Re: GUILE's GC - why we strugglingto solve already solved problems?) Dirk Herrmann
05:05 Re: OK, what about some resolution (Re: GUILE's GC - why we struggling to solve already solved problems?) Khimenko Victor
05:03 Re: GUILE's GC - why we struggling to solve already solved pr oblems ? (was Re: finding the top of the stack in linux) Khimenko Victor
05:00 Re: Problems running guile-doc-snarf Michael Livshin
00:57 OK, what about some resolution (Re: GUILE's GC - why we struggling to solve already solved problems?) Michael Livshin
00:20 Re: GUILE's GC - why we struggling to solve already solved pr oblems ? (was Re: finding the top of the stack in linux) Han-Wen Nienhuys

July 18, 2000
21:54 guile as applications language Han-Wen Nienhuys
19:42 Re: GUILE's GC - why we struggling to solve already solved pr oblems ? (was Re: finding the top of the stack in linux) Jim Blandy
15:09 Re: GUILE's GC - why we struggling to solve already solved problems ? (was Re: finding the top of the stack in linux) Chris Cramer
13:55 Re: GUILE's GC - why we struggling to solve already solved problems ? (was Re: finding the top of the stack in linux) Clark McGrew
13:09 Re: GUILE's GC - why we struggling to solve already solved problems ? (was Re: finding the top of the stack in linux) Jim Blandy
13:09 RE: GUILE's GC - why we struggling to solve already solved problems ? (was Re: finding the top of the stack in linux) Brent Fulgham
13:06 Re: GUILE's GC - why we struggling to solve already solved problems ? (was Re: finding the top of the stack in linux) Jost Boekemeier
13:05 Re: GUILE's GC - why we struggling to solve already solved problems ? (was Re: finding the top of the stack in linux) Jim Blandy
12:32 Re: GUILE's GC - why we struggling to solve already solved problems ? (was Re: finding the top of the stack in linux) Khimenko Victor
12:24 Re: GUILE's GC - why we struggling to solve already solved problems ? (was Re: finding the top of the stack in linux) Per Bothner
10:20 Re: GUILE's GC - why we struggling to solve already solved problems ? (was Re: finding the top of the stack in linux) Jim Blandy
09:33 Re: guile and SWIG Matthias Köppe
09:30 Re: boehm & guile, success report. Jost Boekemeier
09:13 Re: guile ughs? Dirk Herrmann
08:08 guile and SWIG Patrik Sundberg
07:16 Re: boehm & guile, success report. Michael Livshin
06:57 Re: boehm & guile, success report. Han-Wen Nienhuys
06:45 Re: guile ughs? Han-Wen Nienhuys
06:38 Re: guile ughs? Dirk Herrmann
06:34 Re: boehm & guile, success report. Michael Livshin
06:09 Re: boehm & guile, success report. Han-Wen Nienhuys
05:47 Re: boehm & guile, success report. Michael Livshin
05:16 Re: boehm & guile, success report. Han-Wen Nienhuys
04:51 Re: boehm & guile, success report. Michael Livshin
04:33 boehm & guile, success report. Han-Wen Nienhuys
03:57 guile ughs? Han-Wen Nienhuys
00:33 Patch to allow exhaustive gc checks. Dirk Herrmann

July 17, 2000
21:54 Re: guile as applications language Richard Stallman
21:47 Re: GUILE's GC - why we struggling to solve already solved problems ? (was Re: finding the top of the stack in linux) Khimenko Victor
21:33 Re: GUILE's GC - why we struggling to solve already solved problems ? (was Re: finding the top of the stack in linux) Khimenko Victor
15:59 Re: GUILE's GC - why we struggling to solve already solved problems ? (was Re: finding the top of the stack in linux) Marius Vollmer
15:41 Re: GUILE's GC - why we struggling to solve already solved problems ? (was Re: finding the top of the stack in linux) Tom Tromey
15:26 Re: time macro Keisuke Nishida
15:26 Re: GUILE's GC - why we struggling to solve already solved problems ? (was Re: finding the top of the stack in linux) Jim Blandy
15:20 Re: GUILE's GC - why we struggling to solve already solved problems ? (was Re: finding the top of the stack in linux) Tom Tromey
15:13 Re: call a C-routine as a Scheme function? Marius Vollmer
15:03 Re: guile as applications language Marius Vollmer
15:03 Re: time macro Marius Vollmer
15:03 Re: call a C-routine as a Scheme function? Marius Vollmer
15:03 Re: GUILE's GC - why we struggling to solve already solved problems ? (was Re: finding the top of the stack in linux) Marius Vollmer
13:57 Re: call a C-routine as a Scheme function? Jost Boekemeier
13:51 Re: finding the top of the stack in linux Chris Cramer
13:01 Re: call a C-routine as a Scheme function? Marius Vollmer
13:00 Re: Bug in scm_call_catching_errors Marius Vollmer
11:46 Re: gh_module_lookup(vec, *sname); How do I get vec? John Daschbach
10:45 taking over main? Han-Wen Nienhuys
10:37 Re: Translation for extension is a bad idea Carl R. Witty
10:05 GUILE's GC - why we struggling to solve already solved problems ? (was Re: finding the top of the stack in linux) Han-Wen Nienhuys
09:56 Re: guile as applications language Han-Wen Nienhuys
09:54 Re: gh_module_lookup(vec, *sname); How do I get vec? John Daschbach
09:47 GUILE's GC - why we struggling to solve already solved problems ? (was Re: finding the top of the stack in linux) Khimenko Victor
08:10 Re: guile as applications language Neil W. Van Dyke
08:08 An interesting idea Jonathan Bartlett
07:41 Re: cgi with guile Jonathan Bartlett
07:33 guile as applications language Han-Wen Nienhuys
07:09 Re: cgi with guile Dirk Herrmann
06:33 finding the top of the stack in linux Han-Wen Nienhuys
06:21 Re: time macro Harvey J. Stein
06:18 cgi with guile Olivier Buechel
05:18 Re: call a C-routine as a Scheme function? Jost Boekemeier
05:12 Re: time macro Nicolas Neuss
03:06 bug in scm_make_struct? Dirk Herrmann

July 16, 2000
22:04 finding the top of the stack in linux Chris Cramer
16:47 Re: guile as applications language Khimenko Victor
13:21 Re: [guile as applications language] Ariel Rios
12:17 Re: call a C-routine as a Scheme function? Han-Wen Nienhuys
12:13 guile as applications language Neil W. Van Dyke
11:21 Re: call a C-routine as a Scheme function? Jim Blandy
07:05 Re: call a C-routine as a Scheme function? Han-Wen Nienhuys

July 15, 2000
20:59 time macro Keisuke Nishida
19:42 Re: Scheme profiler? Keisuke Nishida
15:23 Scheme profiler? Keisuke Nishida
15:03 guile-help-0.1 Keisuke Nishida
12:29 Re: HTTP server Chris Cramer
07:23 HTTP server Ivan Toshkov
06:56 Re: call a C-routine as a Scheme function? Jost Boekemeier
06:03 Re: gh_module_lookup(vec, *sname); How do I get vec? Jost Boekemeier

July 14, 2000
15:40 call a C-routine as a Scheme function? Han-Wen Nienhuys
15:24 gh_module_lookup(vec, *sname); How do I get vec? John Daschbach
14:00 RE: Translation for extension is a bad idea Brent Fulgham
11:21 Re: Translation for extension is a bad idea Carl R. Witty
05:34 Re: Guile scanners and parsers Harvey J. Stein
04:15 Re: Guile scanners and parsers Jost Boekemeier
03:52 Re: Guile scanners and parsers Ian Grant
03:37 Re: Guile scanners and parsers Jost Boekemeier
00:24 Guile scanners and parsers Ian Grant
00:14 Re: Infix arithmetic module Ian Grant

July 13, 2000
23:39 Problems running guile-doc-snarf Shawn
20:25 Re: Translation for extension is a bad idea sen_ml
19:52 Re: Translation for extension is a bad idea Telford Tendys
17:03 RE: Translation for extension is a bad idea Brent Fulgham
16:27 RE: continuation theory (Re: Translators, yet once more) Brent Fulgham
15:19 Re: Infix arithmetic module Michael Vanier
11:30 Re: Translation for extension is a bad idea Jost Boekemeier
10:31 Re: Library facilities for Scheme?... thi
09:55 Re: Translation for extension is a bad idea Greg J. Badros
09:55 Re: continuation theory (Re: Translators, yet once more) Jost Boekemeier
09:47 Re: Segfault when running out of stack Michael Livshin
09:40 Segfault when running out of stack Mark Seaborn
09:26 Re: Translation for extension is a bad idea John Harper
09:17 Re: Translation for extension is a bad idea Jonathan Bartlett
09:01 Re: Translation for extension is a bad idea Greg J. Badros
07:48 Re: continuation theory (Re: Translators, yet once more) Lynn Winebarger
04:12 guile-arith Han-Wen Nienhuys
02:44 Infix arithmetic module Ian Grant
02:09 Re: continuation theory (Re: Translators, yet once more) Michael Livshin
01:13 Bug in scm_call_catching_errors Dirk Herrmann
01:13 [OT] Re: Translation for extension is a bad idea Michael Livshin
00:58 Re: Multiple independent Guile interpreters Ivan Toshkov
00:27 Adding infix arithmetic expressions to guile Ian Grant

July 12, 2000
21:23 Multiple independent Guile interpreters Jon Trowbridge
18:10 Re: Translation for extension is a bad idea Jost Boekemeier
16:59 Re: continuation theory (Re: Translators, yet once more) Telford Tendys
16:38 Re: Translation for extension is a bad idea Michael Vanier
16:03 Re: Translation for extension is a bad idea Jost Boekemeier
13:41 Re: Translation for extension is a bad idea Michael Vanier
13:37 Re: Translation for extension is a bad idea Michael Vanier
13:25 Re: Translation for extension is a bad idea Carl R. Witty
13:07 Re: Translation for extension is a bad idea Jonathan Bartlett
12:26 Re: GUILE_OLD_ASYNC_CLICK Mikael Djurfeldt
12:23 Re: Translation for extension is a bad idea Jonathan Bartlett
12:09 Re: Translation for extension is a bad idea Jonathan Bartlett
11:47 Re: Translation for extension is a bad idea "Jürgen A. Erhard"
11:08 Re: Translation for extension is a bad idea Jorgen 'forcer' Schaefer
09:17 Re: Translation for extension is a bad idea Jost Boekemeier
08:56 RE: Translation for extension is a bad idea Han-Wen Nienhuys
07:26 Re: Translation for extension is a bad idea Jon Trowbridge
07:17 Re: Translation for extension is a bad idea Jonathan Bartlett
01:42 GUILE_OLD_ASYNC_CLICK Dirk Herrmann
01:21 Re: Translation for extension is a bad idea Lalo Martins
00:15 Re: Translation for extension is a bad idea Michael Vanier

July 11, 2000
19:25 Re: Translation for extension is a bad idea Lalo Martins
18:29 RE: Translation for extension is a bad idea Jasvir Nagra
17:38 RE: Translation for extension is a bad idea Brent Fulgham
16:45 RE: Translation for extension is a bad idea Khimenko Victor
15:23 Re: Translation for extension is a bad idea Jost Boekemeier
15:19 Re: Translation for extension is a bad idea Michael Vanier
15:17 RE: Translation for extension is a bad idea Brent Fulgham
14:30 Re: Translation for extension is a bad idea Han-Wen Nienhuys
11:06 RE: Translation for extension is a bad idea Brent Fulgham
10:27 RE: continuation theory (Re: Translators, yet once more) Brent Fulgham
10:11 Re: Translation for extension is a bad idea Jost Boekemeier
09:47 How do I ... (Goops) rm
09:34 Translation for extension is a bad idea Han-Wen Nienhuys
08:01 Homeworker Needed ttserve
06:58 Mikael Ian Grant
06:28 Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ? rm
03:08 Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ? Richard Stallman
02:31 Re: continuation theory (Re: Translators, yet once more) Richard Guenther
02:20 Re: continuation theory (Re: Translators, yet once more) Michael Livshin
01:48 Re: Translators, yet once more (Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ?) Michael Livshin
01:32 Re: Translators, yet once more (Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ?) Dirk Herrmann

July 10, 2000
23:34 Re: continuation theory (Re: Translators, yet once more) Chris Cramer
22:08 Re: Scheme as an abstract syntax tree. Lalo Martins
21:33 Re: Translators, yet once more (Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ?) Moshe Zadka
21:06 Re: continuation theory (Re: Translators, yet once more) John A. Maxwell
20:39 continuation theory (Re: Translators, yet once more) Telford Tendys
19:33 Re: Scheme as an abstract syntax tree. Jorgen 'forcer' Schaefer
17:46 Re: Scheme as an abstract syntax tree. Lalo Martins
16:58 Re: Scheme as an abstract syntax tree. Jorgen 'forcer' Schaefer
15:27 Re: Translators, yet once more (Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ?) Jost Boekemeier
15:22 Re: Translators, yet once more (Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ?) Michael Vanier
15:19 Re: Guile IMHO and a proposal. Michael Vanier
15:09 Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ? thi
13:09 Re: Translators, yet once more (Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ?) Michael Livshin
12:17 Emacs-like text buffer Keisuke Nishida
12:16 Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ? Mark Galassi
12:09 Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ? Richard Stallman
12:06 Re: Guile IMHO and a proposal. Richard Stallman
12:02 Re: Guile IMHO and a proposal. Khimenko Victor
12:02 Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ? Mark Galassi
12:01 Re: Translators, yet once more (Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ?) Khimenko Victor
11:48 Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ? Khimenko Victor
11:46 Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ? Khimenko Victor
11:34 Re: Scheme as an abstract syntax tree. Jost Boekemeier
11:29 Re: Scheme as an abstract syntax tree. Jost Boekemeier
10:10 Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ? Jost Boekemeier
09:12 Re: Scheme as an abstract syntax tree. Per Bothner
09:04 Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ? Richard Stallman
08:52 Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ? Ian Grant
08:16 Re:Scheme as an abstract syntax tree. Trevor Lowing
08:06 Re: Guile IMHO and a proposal. Jonathan Bartlett
07:40 Guile IMHO and a proposal. Trevor Lowing
07:26 Scheme as an abstract syntax tree. Jonathan Bartlett
05:31 Re: Translators, yet once more (Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ?) Moshe Zadka
05:26 Re: Translators, yet once more (Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ?) Ken Anderson
05:17 Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ? rm
05:14 Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ? rm
04:49 Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ? thi
04:30 Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ? rm
02:56 Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ? Shawn
02:16 Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ? Ivan Toshkov
01:02 Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ? Richard Stallman

July 09, 2000
23:44 Re: Translators, yet once more (Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Pythonvs ?) Moshe Zadka
23:28 Re: Translators, yet once more (Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ?) Lalo Martins
23:00 Re: Translators, yet once more (Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Pythonvs ?) Moshe Zadka
22:41 Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ? Moshe Zadka
22:17 Re: Library facilities for Scheme?... thi
17:19 Translators, yet once more (Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ?) Lalo Martins
17:05 Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ? Mikael Djurfeldt
16:35 Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ? Mark Galassi
15:50 Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ? Richard Stallman
15:50 Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ? Richard Stallman
12:44 Re: Library facilities for Scheme?... thi
11:37 Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ? Mikael Djurfeldt
11:12 ANNOUNCE: guile-pg Version 0.07 Ian Grant
11:00 Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ? Khimenko Victor
09:40 Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ? Per Bothner
06:55 Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ? rm
06:06 Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ? Nic Ferrier
04:42 guile-c.el Keisuke Nishida
03:42 Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ? Michael Livshin
02:39 Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ? rm

July 08, 2000
15:46 Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ? Richard Stallman

July 07, 2000
15:33 Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ? Chris Cramer
11:39 Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ? Mikael Djurfeldt
10:59 Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ? Richard Stallman
08:32 hash-set! segmentation fault [FIXED] Dirk Herrmann
04:05 Re: another nit. Han-Wen Nienhuys

July 06, 2000
21:46 Re: another nit. Mikael Djurfeldt
21:03 Re: another nit. William Webber
18:00 Re: undefined ? Mikael Djurfeldt
17:58 Re: undefined ? Mikael Djurfeldt
17:32 Re: another nit. Mikael Djurfeldt
15:50 Re: another nit. Eric Moore
15:14 Re: another nit. Dirk Herrmann
14:26 guile 1.4 patch to compile on Windows 2000 Richard Y. Kim
14:22 Re: another nit. Harvey J. Stein
13:53 Re: undefined ? Jost Boekemeier
13:30 Re: undefined ? Mikael Djurfeldt
13:03 Re: undefined ? Jost Boekemeier
13:01 Re: oops Jost Boekemeier
12:34 Re: another nit. Han-Wen Nienhuys
12:32 undefined ? Han-Wen Nienhuys
12:20 oops Han-Wen Nienhuys
12:18 Re: another nit. Craig Brozefsky
12:10 Re: another nit. Jost Boekemeier
11:54 Re: another nit. Andrew Ho
11:38 Re: another nit. Craig Brozefsky
11:36 Re: another nit. Harvey J. Stein
10:50 Re: another nit. Han-Wen Nienhuys
08:42 Re: another nit. thi
08:09 Re: another nit. Clark McGrew
07:53 Re: another nit. Jonathan Bartlett
07:46 Re: another nit. Harvey J. Stein
07:29 Re: another nit. Michael Livshin
07:26 Re: another nit. Mikael Djurfeldt
07:21 Re: another nit. Dirk Herrmann
07:11 Re: another nit. Jonathan Bartlett
07:08 Re: another nit. Harvey J. Stein
06:53 Re: another nit. Michael Livshin
06:35 Re: assq-ref vs assq Michael Livshin
06:29 Re: another nit. Han-Wen Nienhuys
06:08 Re: another nit. Dirk Herrmann
05:24 Re: assq-ref vs assq Han-Wen Nienhuys
05:15 Re: assq-ref vs assq Michael Livshin
04:33 assq-ref vs assq Han-Wen Nienhuys
04:01 Re: another nit. Michael Livshin
03:11 Re: another nit. Dirk Herrmann

July 05, 2000
19:54 Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ? Chris Cramer
17:03 Re: Critical Sections in GUILE NIIBE Yutaka
13:27 Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ? thi
12:12 Re: PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ? Jost Boekemeier
07:51 PHP fork project- Guile vs Python vs ? Trevor Lowing
05:04 Homeworker Needed ttserve
01:01 Re: Critical Sections in GUILE Dirk Herrmann
00:50 Re: Critical Sections in GUILE Dirk Herrmann

July 04, 2000
19:40 Critical Sections in GUILE NIIBE Yutaka
14:11 Re: (module related) simple question Paul Emsley
10:14 Re: simple question Mikael Djurfeldt
10:10 Re: simple question Mikael Djurfeldt
03:49 simple question Paul.Emsley
02:56 Re: [Q] (newbie here) Guile as an extention language. sen_ml

July 02, 2000
22:33 Promociona tu Negocio Benito Cadena Lagunes
12:50 Re: TO JULIAN: Re: two modules: (ice-9 rationals), (ice-9 rational-object) Karl M. Hegbloom

July 01, 2000
10:39 TO JULIAN: Re: two modules: (ice-9 rationals), (ice-9 rational-object) Mikael Djurfeldt
10:12 Re: more guile for perl refugees (split, join) Mikael Djurfeldt


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.4.6