Re: [Q] (newbie here) Guile as an extention language.

[sen_ml at eccosys dot com]

From: thi <ttn@revel.glug.org>
Subject: Re: [Q] (newbie here) Guile as an extention language.
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 08:38:56 -0700
Message-ID: <200006291538.IAA32003@revel.glug.org>

>    From: sen_ml@eccosys.com
>    Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 11:40:43 +0900
> 
>      http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/wilson/schintro/schintro_17.html#SEC17
> 
>    says it is.  perhaps this is just a bug?  or am i missing something?
>    should i be using a different mode?
> 
>    what about macros?  at least in lisp-interactive-mode, they don't
>    appear to receive different coloring in my environment.  i tried
>    using `define-syntax' to define a macro but when i used the name of
>    the macro, i didn't see its color change.
> 
>    btw, i'm using the scheme-mode that comes w/ emacs version 20.7.2.
> 
> ideally emacs would detect `define-syntax' (or regexp "define.*") and
> keep a little database of new symbols that are dynamically font-locked.
> unfortunately, i've not enough energy at this time to follow through w/
> some elisp hacking... [skulks away quietly]

perhaps these kinds of projects can get listed somewhere for future
reference ;-)

btw, what about 'set!'?