This is the mail archive of the
guile@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Guile project.
Re: (Meta) Guile and direction (Re: Syntatic sugar and identifier permissivity)
Lalo Martins <lalo@hackandroll.org> writes:
> Michael, it is only "wrong-headed" in the context of Scheme.
> For the practical user, Guile itself is "wrong-headed", and so
> is generic programming instead of class-centered OOP. Your
> reasoning is clear proof of what I'm trying to say.
so much for trying not to use smilies. oh well...
as for your suggestion: it's still wrong-headed. in the context of
Guile Scheme it's redundant. in the context of some hypotetical
translated-to-Guile class-based OO language, it's also redundant
because that language has it's own syntax for it's own features.
--
I'm a Lisp variable -- bind me!