This is the mail archive of the
guile@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Guile project.
Re: A module system should resolve, not introduce, name conflicts
Mikael Djurfeldt <mdj@mdj.nada.kth.se> writes:
> Again: The meta-language is not some global thing but associated with
> the repl. This means that there is one syntax for the Scheme repl,
> and other for other repls.
This contradicts with what you've said earlier:
> It seems quite obvious that what you want to import is the bindings
> which the code in your module uses, and nothing else. It also seems
> obvious that you would like the metalanguage to stay constant while
> walking around among modules.
And I agree. How should the tcl equivalent of `,config' look like?
How should the perl equivalent of `,in' look like?
No, I think it is better to use only one command: control-d which
terminates the current repl and gets you back to the well known config
module.
Jost
- References:
- A module system should resolve, not introduce, name conflicts
- Re: A module system should resolve, not introduce, name conflicts
- Re: A module system should resolve, not introduce, name conflicts
- Re: A module system should resolve, not introduce, name conflicts
- Re: A module system should resolve, not introduce, name conflicts