This is the mail archive of the
guile@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Guile project.
Re: Guile docstrings---should Guile code be ANSI C compatible?
Gary Houston <ghouston@arglist.com> writes:
> | Hmm... In revision 1.35 of __scm.h, the line you refer to was changed
> | from
> |
> | typedef long long_long;
> |
> | to
> |
> | typedef long long long_long;
> |
> | Was this intentional, Gary? If so, we need to provide an alternative
> | for systems which lack long longs.
>
> It was intentional, but it's only used in code protected by
> HAVE_LONG_LONGS as far as I can see. Why not just put an #ifdef
> around it, or remove it completely and use long long in the code?
Sound OK to me. :)