This is the mail archive of the
guile@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Guile project.
Re: Small troubles in startup
- To: "Daschbach, John L" <John dot Daschbach at pnl dot gov>
- Subject: Re: Small troubles in startup
- From: Greg Harvey <Greg dot Harvey at thezone dot net>
- Date: 01 Dec 1999 15:56:12 -0330
- Cc: guile at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- References: <9E7114DE3DF0D21192F80008C7A49DC850EAF0@pnlmse8.pnl.gov>
"Daschbach, John L" <John.Daschbach@pnl.gov> writes:
> >> be done by hand. Calls to use-modules in the .gule file are not
> visible.
>
> >Actually, they are... um, for normal guile invocations, anyway ;).
>
> Not sure what you mean by this. I'm running a guile built from CVS sources,
> perhaps a week or so old. For me, even a normal incovation doesn't make symbols
> defined by modules called in .guile visible in the repl. At least this is true
> for (use-modules (ice-9 popen)) and (open-pipe). I don't see any real
> difference between a 'normal' invocation of guile and my own invocation.
Oops, I meant to erase that bit before I sent it. It used to work (so
I started out assuming that it still did; stupid thing to do really),
but it did break somewhere along the way. The patch is the simplest
way of doing it, but there might be nicer ways; this really is the
behaviour that should occur.
> Is there any kind of autodoc parser working for guile? It looks like much of
> the code has been formatted to allow extraction of documentation, or at least
> indexing.
I think it's more for `informational browsing' :)
--
Greg