This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Guile project.
Re: "environment" unsuitable name for top-level environment
Jost Boekemeier <email@example.com.TU-Berlin.DE> writes:
> Keith Wright <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > I am assuming that top-level environments, local environments,
> That's the problem. A local environment is *not* an environment.
Hmm... from R5RS:
"The set of all visible bindings in effect at some point in a program
is known as the environment in effect at that point."
(There are more examples to pick from.)
This is always represented by the data type I want to call
`environment' (the one corresponding to the env argument of eval) but
only in some cases (top-level position) represented by the data type
of Jim's proposal.
> Either the local- or the top-level environments need a new name.
> I prefer calling local environment frames either env-frame or
env-frame is unsuitable since it refers only to a component of the
I prefer `environment' since that's what it's called in R5RS and in
other Scheme implementations (e.g. SCM, and, if I remember correctly,