This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Guile project.
Re: Reintroducing old `defined?' (was Re: Testing availabilty of a procedure)
>>>>> "Marius" == Marius Vollmer <email@example.com> writes:
>> *** I suggest that we rename the current `defined?' into
>> `bound?' and re-introduce scm's special form `defined?'.
Marius> I would prefer to stick to `module-defined?' and require
Marius> people to be explicit about module issues.
Hmm... Right now, except for slapping define-module, use-modules and
export on to the front of code, code doesn't need to know anything
about the module system. One thing I like about the current module
system is that it is non-intrusive. I hope it stays that way.