This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the guile project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Reintroducing old `defined?' (was Re: Testing availabilty of a procedure)

On Mon, May 03, 1999 at 02:50:17PM +0200, Mikael Djurfeldt wrote:
> *** I suggest that we rename the current `defined?' into `bound?' and
>     re-introduce scm's special form `defined?'.

	I agree with you. After this is done in guile, one should
persuade the rnrs authors to include this in the next edition.

%!PS Il n'y a pas de mauvaises reponses, il n'y a que de mauvaises questions
/B{bind def}def/m{moveto}B/d{dup}B/s{gsave}B/r{grestore}B/S{stroke}B/P{false 
charpath}B/G{setgray}B/W{setlinewidth}B/z{0 G 1 W}B/Times-Roman findfont 120 
scalefont setfont 60 10 m 56 rotate( d s z 40 40 rmoveto
P S r s 0.5 G .5 W P flattenpath{newpath m 40 40 rlineto S}d{}{}pathforall 
r s z P S r 400 120 m (Bertrand) show 400 -160 m (Petit) show showpage