This is the mail archive of the guile@cygnus.com mailing list for the guile project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: apply vs. @apply


mdj@nada.kth.se writes:
>
> You're probably right, but it is anyway better to have a working apply
> binding already from the start, in case we discover that we *would*
> need it before the replacements have been loaded. 

I agree. 

> > > apply:nconc2last can easily be called from within the evaluator
> > > instead.  That would also be slightly more efficient.
> > > 
> > 
> > That's what I was thinking, especially since that is what scm_apply
> > essentially does.
> 
> Will you do it?  (But keep the replacements in the scheme file, just
> remove the apply:nconc call.)
> 

Yes.

 - Maciej