This is the mail archive of the guile@cygnus.com mailing list for the guile project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
On 12 Nov 1998, Valentin Kamyshenko wrote: > To say truth, I do not understand, why rationals are not supported in > many realizations of scheme (including that, which do support > bignums). To make rationals as smobs (having bignums) seems to be > nearly trivial, isn't it? yes. I wouldn't call it trivial, but it wouldn't be too difficult. The catch is this: If you're happy with your rationals being printed like #<Rational: 21/13> and being un-"read"-able, well then, there you are. What I mean is that the hard part would be to make the Guile interpreter correctly parse, read, and write "34/21" (or, God help us, "1+34/55i"). Jay Glascoe jglascoe@jay.giss.nasa.gov